“Some people told me this is a good place to take photographs”, the young woman said to me with a smile. We were the only two people at the top of the circular tower at the Overseas Passenger Terminal. She was a twenty-something woman visiting from Japan, and she had her heart set on taking a photograph of Sydney Opera House at sunrise. “This is a good spot”, I assured her, and by the look of things (with a bit of patchy cloud around), it looked like it would indeed be a lovely sunrise.
Within a few minutes, however, a cruise ship came into sight, threatening our view of the Opera House.
When it was pretty obvious our view would soon be fully obscured, we both headed downstairs to locate a more suitable spot.
The more “suitable” spot was eventually obscured by a tug boat, and workers securing the cruise ship.
Though I found this work really interesting to watch and photograph, the young woman found it increasingly frustrating. She wanted her “clear view” of the Sydney Opera House at dawn.
There were heaps of photographers, as well as lots of passersby at Circular Quay this morning. They appear to have much in common with those people you see fishing around the harbour, lots of equipment and lots of patience.Eventually, the young tourist, the photographers and I were rewarded with a terrific sunrise photograph.Unless there’s a cruise ship in front of you, this tower normally affords you a wonderful 360 view of Circular Quay, the Sydney Harbour Bridge and the Sydney Opera House.
Roger Summerill, the manager of the ABC’s successful Sydney radio station 702, is about to retire. He steps down next month and true to form, the ABC can’t quite decide on his successor. So the Melbourne-based head of ABC Radio, Sue Howard, has okayed a three-way trial to find a replacement. The three candidates — James O’Brien, program director at 702; Mike McCluskey, manager of the ABC local radio station in Newcastle, and the program director at 774 in Melbourne — will all get the chance to manage 702 for a month each and the choice will then be made. O’Brien has been as much responsible for the success of 702 as Summerill, so insiders think he should get a chance to show if he can make the next step up. At least the ABC has candidates — over at SBS Radio I hear the selection process for the new senior executive team is running very late, with a shortage of candidates. —
“My wife has COVID for the first time, and I had it a couple of weeks ago”, a colleague told us as we sat around yesterday and consumed our work’s “Christmas Lunch”.
“Because I live alone and mostly work at home, I’ve managed to avoid it”, I told my colleagues, as we shared our experiences of the last twelve months.
However, in the last week or so I’ve been feeling tired, albeit without the “spicy cough”. Nonetheless, I think I’ll pop into the chemist tomorrow (wearing a mask) and pick up a RAT. Or maybe, it’s just because of a disturbed sleep pattern, waking up in the middle of the night and watching the World Cup? Also, I’ve been powering through the Nikki Savva book, “Bulldozed” about this year’s Australian election, which is very good.
It was a bit weird catching up with colleagues today, since some of whom I’ve only seen in real life half a dozen times this year.
“I’m so sorry, I missed your birthday”, one of them said to me. Another talked about their child starting school next year. “Oh my God, I remember when you brought them to work in a pram”, I said.
For me, it’s one of my busiest times of the year work-wise, as I help keep the ship sailing, while many others take time off.
I’m heading up to Lismore again, and will do my job from there for a couple of weeks.
The one bright spot from this year’s Lismore flood was a spending decision by my family. Despite being quite spartan, generally, they decided their “Christmas Treat” was to have air conditioning installed in the back part of the house.
“Has the air conditioning been installed”?, I asked Pat on the phone today. “Nah”, she said with disappointment in her voice. For some dumb arse reason, the installation won’t occur until February, she told me. “But we’ve got fans”, she added.
Between now and heading to Lismore, there are a few more Christmas parties to be had, including another this weekend.
Last weekend I caught up with some long-time friends, connected because we’re ABBA fans. It was a fun event, though we hardly talked at all about ABBA. I noted on the day we spent a lot of time talking about medical conditions, as you do when you get to a “certain age”. One of us retired earlier this year, another announced their “official retirement” on Saturday.
Not ABBA Drinks
I also caught up with some former colleagues last week and will be going to an event tomorrow night put on by the ABC Alumni, a group of former ABC staff members. I figured I should get to know what’s happening with them, as I edge closer to retirement.
Today, I’m sharing an interview with former NRL referee Bill Harrigan from my own career archives, having worked in radio for a fairly long time.
I’m not too sure how many people outside of dedicated Rugby League fans remember Bill now, but back in the late 1990s and early 2000s, he was a legend—the face of refereeing in the game. When he released his autobiography, The Bill Harrigan Story, I interviewed him about his life both on and off the field.
🎙️ Summary of the Bill Harrigan Interview
In this interview, Bill Harrigan offers a rare perspective on refereeing Rugby League, explaining that he can’t enjoy the game like a spectator because he’s constantly focusing on rules and angles, noting that television angles often misrepresent his view. He addresses the public perception that he is “arrogant” and “up himself,” stating that his autobiography was intended to change that view by revealing his background as a police officer and his personality. Harrigan recounts a terrifying experience in 1985 while serving with the Tactical Response Group during the Bathurst bike riots, where he was fire-fighting police officers hit by Molotov cocktails and had to run for his life after chasing a rioter. He clarifies that he left the police force not due to fear, but for the opportunity to become a full-time referee in 1995. Finally, he shares the humorous anecdote of appearing on the dating show Perfect Match in the early eighties to win a travel prize, admitting he and his match “spiced it up” for the cameras even though he was seeing someone else. He concludes by expressing concern about his career prospects after retirement, noting the financial necessity of finding a new job immediately.
🎙️ ABC ARCHIVES: Interview with Bill Harrigan
Bill Harrigan: First. I’m involved in the game that much that it’s a methodical thing where I’m just going through the rules and watching the play and calling the shots and all that sort of thing. So I don’t get to enjoy it like a spectator does in the grandstand all back in, you know, sitting in their lounge room. And that’s why I’ve got to go home and watch it. And I haven’t had an opportunity yet. I’ve been too busy since the grand final. But in saying that too, I get a whole a different view to what you do. And a lot of people make this mistake. They go, oh, why didn’t he see that forward pass? But they’re seeing it from the camera angle or from where they’re sitting in the grandstand. Now, when I’m down on ground level, I’m looking through I’ve got a different angle completely. So I’ve got a different perspective of it. I’ve got players in front of me. Um, I may be looking at something else and just miss something. And yet people say, oh, how could he miss that? But they’re seeing a completely different angle to what I am.
James O’Brien: Do you ever get confused by what’s going on? Do you ever find yourself thinking, hang on, stuff’s going on here. I don’t know what’s going on.
Bill Harrigan: You do that sometimes if you get a pinball effect. And that is when someone kicks the ball and then it hits somebody and it ricochets off him and hits somebody else and then hits somebody else, and then all of a sudden somebody’s got the ball and running and you’re thinking, what happened there? And then you quickly replay it back in your mind and you go hit him. Went to him, went to him. It’s okay. Play on or you go knock on.
James O’Brien: So even though if it’s not immediately obvious, you still can sort of recount things.
Bill Harrigan: Yeah. The biggest thing is to try and get it right. And so sometimes you may have a, it might only be a second, second and a half delay in making a decision, but that seems like an eternity to everybody else because you’re thinking, jeez, he blew that whistle late. What’s going on? But what you’re doing is you’re replaying it over in your mind and you’re going, bang! Yeah, that happened, that happened, that happened. Oh yeah. Play on or do this. And that’s why the delays there.
James O’Brien: Now you’re out and about promoting your autobiography. Why do you think people want to read the Bill Harrigan story?
Bill Harrigan: Um, well, I’m hoping I’ve got a profile big enough and people are interested enough to pick up the book and have a look at it. And when they do, and they read about it because it’s not just about football and about my refereeing days. It’s about days in the cops and growing up and my beliefs and that sort of thing. But I think the biggest thing that I’m trying to achieve there is there is a perception of who Bill Harrigan is or who I’m like.
James O’Brien: What do you think the perception is?
Bill Harrigan: Well, the perception is that this bloke’s up himself and he’s arrogant and all that sort of thing. And and my wife had that at the start with the guy who wrote the book with me, Daniel Lane. His attitude was, yeah, this this bloke’s Hollywood. He’s certainly changed. When you pick up the book and you read it, I think you’ll change your opinion.
James O’Brien: There are some really interesting little bits of trivia in the book that I came across. I mean, obviously we know the big picture story, but there are a couple of nice little stories that I hope you might tell. Uh, in the mid eighties, you were part of the Tactical Response group of the New South Wales Police. You were in a pretty dangerous situation in Bathurst at Easter with the bike riots. Can you explain what happened there?
Bill Harrigan: Yes. Nineteen eighty five Bathurst bike races. And every year it’s. And it’s not bikie gangs either. It’s just bikers who go up there and some of them then drink too much. Think okay, let’s have a bit of fun. We’ll go out and we’ll rock the police compound. And so they start rocking it with bottles and rocks. Then it becomes Molotov cocktails and soaked toilet rolls and petrol. So they’re all flaming on fire.
James O’Brien: How old were you at the time?
Bill Harrigan: Um, back then, I was twenty five years of age, and I’d been, uh, two and a half, three years in the elite Tactical Response Group. I was in that from day one when it first was put together. Um, we’d trained for it. We got called up to help protect the twelve police officers that were just up there roaming the, you know, the hill and policing the hill just as they normally would. Um, they come under fire. So we got called up there. Out we went. By this time, there was a crowd of, you know, around four thousand people had surrounded the compound and the compound was on fire. The roof was on fire. They were out there trying to put that out. There was bottles and rocks being slammed all over the place, and we had to run out and try and stop the crowd from attacking the compound and just disperse them.
James O’Brien: How scared were you?
Bill Harrigan: Well, I was packing it. Yeah, absolutely. packing it. And, um, you know, you can put a lot more blunt than that, but we won’t. Um, but I was very scared out there. I was fearful for my life. Because in the end, as things happen, I got blokes standing beside me getting hit with Molotov cocktails. And the first hour and a half I was the fireman of of a particular line which had twelve fellows in it. If a molotov cocktail or a firebomb come over, I would run to where it looked like it was going to land. If it landed amongst our team, we wouldn’t break our line. You had to stand there and and cop it. So when it shattered, the petrol would flame and it would engulf that person. So we had fire resistant uniforms and everything on, but you still were lit up. My job was to straight away douse him with the extinguisher, put him out, and then if he had got on me, then whack it off on me as well. So that’s what I did. For the first hour and a half. One police officer, he panicked. He turned and ran. He broke the line and was running away. And I had to chase him. You can see me on footage running after him, um, trying to put him out with this extinguisher. Then after that, I went off the fireman’s position for other reasons, and I come back out into the line. And then we were called to charge, and we’d charge forward and move the crowd back, and then we’d have to regroup when we heard the whistle. And on one occasion, there was one guy who was urinating in bottles, throwing him at us, hitting us. Coppers were going down left, right and centre from this guy, and two of us chased him and we got that close to him when we heard the whistle blow to come back and reform. And both of us thought we’ve got him. And so we just went that a little bit further, chasing him, and all of a sudden we’ve chased him too far and we found ourselves amongst a crowd that then turned on us, and we end up having to run for our lives.
James O’Brien: Was it incidents like that which convinced you to leave the police force?
Bill Harrigan: No. I only left the police force eventually because I was offered the job full time refereeing. And that was something.
James O’Brien: That because you were doing part time refereeing at this stage, weren’t you?
Bill Harrigan: Yeah, I was still part time refereeing, and that was back in eighty five. And I went full time in ninety five.
James O’Brien: Was it was it a hard decision or. Um.
Bill Harrigan: No. It was. Well, yeah, it took a long time. But in the end I always I thought I was juggling refereeing and family and police work. So at the end of nineteen ninety five, I was going to retire. All I wanted to do was have one year with the new expanded competition. Because Perth had come into the competition, Auckland had come into the competition, then Super League came along in ninety five and offered full time work for referees. And so I said, yeah, that’s me. I want to have a go at this. And then I didn’t have to juggle everything around.
James O’Brien: The other bit of trivia I found from reading your book is that you were once back in the early eighties on the notorious TV show Perfect Match.
Bill Harrigan: Yes, I.
James O’Brien: Was. And you were picked.
Bill Harrigan: And I was.
James O’Brien: Picked. Okay. Can you tell us what happened there?
Bill Harrigan: Yeah, I went on that, and that was well before I was a first grade referee. So I was just unknown back in those days. But I went on I had the travel bug and I thought, yeah, I’d love to go on this. And they’re giving prizes out to travel to Bali and cruises and all that sort of thing. Why not? Yeah. So I’ll go on it. I went on there, fortunate enough to be picked, had a weekend trip to Bali, um, came back, told our story, went back on the show, ended up being the perfect match. As far as the Dexter rating goes with Wendy, the girl that chose me. We had a seventy five percent match rating, so we got an extra prize. We got one stereo system each, and I just thought the whole thing was fun and it was a great time.
James O’Brien: But you were seeing someone else at the time?
Bill Harrigan: Yes. So I had another girlfriend and I met her after I’d already applied for the show. And so I said, look, I’ve applied for this perfect match, so, you know, should I go on? And she said, yeah, that’d be great, go on and have some fun. So I did go on it. And when we came back, Wendy and I did say, look, ten couples go away each week. Only five get back on the show to tell their story. If we don’t get on, let’s make it. We really didn’t get on. So they want us to go back on the show. And if we do get on, let’s just spice it up a little bit to make it look like we really did get on well. So we still get on there to get the next prize. Yeah. Um, we got on, so we spiced it up, but it was just too spicy.
James O’Brien: See the showman even then, weren’t you?
Bill Harrigan: Yeah, I suppose so.
James O’Brien: Got me in terms of your future. Now what? After you retire from being a referee.
Bill Harrigan: If I decide to retire in the off season, which is what I’m contemplating, whether I come back again for another year or not. Um, I hope that there’s something out there for him in the media. I really I’m at a loss because I had seventeen and a half years in the police. Um, I’ve given that away and I’m thinking, okay, what am I going to do now? And, you know, the money that I’ve earned from refereeing is not enough to turn around and say, hey, I can give this one. No wonder I’m nowhere near what the players earn. So I have to get a job. So as soon as I retire, I’ve got to go and get a job. Otherwise mortgage and food on the table and everything just goes out the door. Um, so I’m just like anybody else there. What I’m going to do, I don’t know. And certainly that will come into consideration.
“There’ll be a new book, a fourth one at the end of August”, we were told today by Carin, our tour group leader for the “(Stieg Larsson) Millenium Tour” run by the Stockholm City Museum, Stockholm Stadsmeet. “We don’t know very much about it”, she went on to say, “except that it hasn’t been written by Stieg Larsson”. The author of the new book was a surprise to me. He is David Lagercrantz, who wrote the best selling book about Swedish footballer, Zlatan Ibrahimovic, and for whom, Carin told us, there was “sport” in writing a new book with the Millenium characters, more than about making money. She also told us there was a fourth unfinished manuscript, and that Larsson had scoped out several other books.
Millenium Tour Group
Having watched the three Swedish films, and the American one, having read all through books in English, and having slowly started the first in Swedish, I was really interested in undertaking the tour. My friend, Grant, had also been on the tour a couple of years ago, and had highly recommended it. I would recommend it too.
Bellmansgatan 1, the apartment where Mikael Blomqvist lived
Over two hours, as you walk around the streets of Södermalm, you get a really strong sense of the physicality of the places mentioned in the books. Our tour guide, Carin, was also really knowledgeable about the films, and about the places that made it into the films, and those which didn’t. Often the changes were made for practical reasons, such as the inability of a film crew to actually fit into a small one-way street. Other times they were made for artistic and aesthetic reasons, such as finding another location which illustrated a thematic point better.
One of the restaurants featured in the book, though it never featured in the moviesKaffee, a shop which features in the American movie, though not in the Swedish movies.,
Carin has also had some lovely anecdotes about the film. For example, for the American film they needed to recreate a winter scene in Stockholm in the middle of May, and so brought in a great deal of man-made snow. There is, however, a continuity error, as in some of the scenes, you’ll actually see snow mixed with trees with their leaves on, and pot plants in full-bloom.
The tour begins with the home of Mikael Blomqvist, and ends with the home of Lisbeth Salander, which we were told was actually owned by a family who doesn’t actually live in the house, except for their annual New Years Eve Party. What a waste! It has great views.
The top two floors of the apartment block where Lisbeth Salander lived, though also not featured in the movies.
The tour guide, Carin, was excellent. She was clearly knowledgable about the books, and with many interesting insights I’d never considered previously. For example, she notes all of the “good” characters live on Södermalm, Kungsholmen is “neutral ground”, and all of the bad characters live in other parts of Stockholm. She also mentioned the connection with Astrid Lindgren’s work, which I’d never previously knew about. Carin brought a lovely sense of humour to the tour as well, and so it was a really enjoyable way to spend a couple of hours on a Saturday afternoon in Stockholm. Highly recommended.
“Because a lot of producers come from a journalism background, they mostly think about the words. I love that he spent so much time speaking about the sound”, I said to someone over drinks at the end of #ozpod2019 today.
We were talking about Dan Blank, creator of the fiction podcast, “Carrier”. Dan, incidentally, has worked mostly in the film industry, virtual reality and such, and this is his first major exploration of audio.
“We have a lot of people in our area with a previous film or vision background, and they make some of the best radio short features, using wonderfully layered sound, often much better than some who have worked exclusively in radio”, I added. I’m not sure why. Perhaps because they’ve often worked predominantly with images, sound presents them with a whole new creative canvas?
It was fascinating to attend this conference for the fourth year in a row, and in particular, to note the evolution of the podcast industry.
True Crime podcast panel talking about fraudsters.
True crime podcasts are still extremely popular, and there was a terrific panel featuring three people who’ve created recent podcasts. One in particular, I’d call out is “Snowball”, which is about the real-life experiences of Ollie Ward’s family who were taken in by a trickster. It’s great listening, and in particular, revelatory hearing how his family really opened up over what was, clearly, an embarrassing situation.
“The key to successful fraudsters is the personal humiliation which makes people not want to talk about this stuff”, Ollie commented.
Another journalist, Greg Bearup who works for “The Australian” spoke about the backgroud to his podcast, “Who The Hell Is Hamish?” which is also about a real life trickster known to his friends and family.
I smiled as he spoke about what it’s like to be a journalist, with thirty years experience, working at the moment. “You feel like you’re the crab in a Chinese restaurant, waiting for the hand to reach in, pick you up and take you away. I just wanted to stay relevant”.
Greg described his interview with a seventeen year old girl as “the most extraordinary of my thirty year career”.
My awesome colleagues, Ian Walker and Kellie Riordan from ABC Audio Studios
Throughout the day there were lots of other handy tips for those currently making, and those aspiring to make podcasts.
Andrew Davies, for example, said the research indicated the online headline and personal recommendations are the top drivers for listeners to try new podcasts, over and above things like cover art and even the actual audio itself.
Marc Fennell noted that in the area of putting together a complex and long-term project that, “having a one line clear reason about what story you’re hoping to tell will get you out of hell every time”.
The interesting development in the podcast space right now is narrative fiction.
One of the panel members talking about this has noted it’s no longer, “knock knock, who’s there, come in” which may have been the style of earlier radio drama.
“People have learned a sophisticated cinematic language since the 1930s and 1940s”, Dan Blank noted, as he spoke about the way this type of audio drama needs to keep pace with the time.
Rachel Fountain from ABC Audio Studios speaks with Dan Blank, creator of the Carrier podcast.
As a “sound guy”, I was fascinated as he spoke about a type of audio recording techniques which can give you a “3D-sound”, which is more natural to the human ears than simple left-right stereo.
As well as catching up with some friends and colleagues from interstate, attending the conference also gave me an opportunity to meet some people who I’ve only ever known through email, phone and video conferencing. There were hugs.
“You know what the best thing about attending a podcast conference is?”, I whispered to a colleague during one of the sessions. “Conference speakers actually know how to speak into a microphone properly!”.
The worst (or perhaps the best) podcast submission received by the ABC.
It’s amazing how quickly you start to tense up, as I did last night (and this morning, and this afternoon), when I got a couple of those “I’m sick and can’t make it” phone calls.
That was the case last night, in particular, as I had just spent the afternoon out of mobile phone range relaxing by a creek not far from Canberra.
“What’s the water like”, my friend Pat, asked me. “Cold”, I told him. “And what’s it’s like under your feet”, he continued, having never experienced what it was like to swim in an inland river.
It was then I remembered the first time I’d swum in an inland river while living at Bourke in Western NSW. I remembered jumping off the rope into the Darling River and discovering mud. Thick mud on the river bed. For a boy who had been raised on the NSW North Coast, it was initially an odd sensation.
And then moving to South Australia – while I don’t ever remember swimming in the Murray – I remembered the sensation of swimming in Lake Bonney at Barmera. Once again, it was mud.
But then, moving to Wagga Wagga, I remembered how wonderful it was to swim in the Murrumbidgee, with its fast flowing water and sand beneath my feet. Yes, sand. It was a great experience and totally relaxing.
I went down to Canberra this weekend for the annual Bush Dance at the Yarralumla Woolshed. I had a great experience last year, and so when Pat offered the invitation I said yes instantly. It wasn’t as busy, though, this year, due to the inclement weather and another, competing activity on the Canberra foreshore.
Gay Bushdance in Canberra – held annually in Canberra at the Yarralumla Woolshed
But unlike last year, we managed a trip into town to Cube Nightclub. We also enjoyed a terrific meal at the Griffith Vietnamese Restaurant which, apparently is one of the must do restaurants in Canberra. All over the wall there were signed notes from significant politicians of both sides of politics. The food was excellent.
Actually, just about everywhere we went politics were in the air, as we listened in to a number of conversations. As we dined on Sunday breakfast at Tilleys, we listened in to a number of conversations with people discussing how the new Labor Government would act on range of issues. “Is that Therese over there?”, one of my friends asked, as a woman who bore a resemblance to Kevin Rudd’s wife came into the cafe. Unfortunately it wasn’t, as I was keen to see if she looked as much like Bette Midler in real life as she did on election night. My strongest memory, however, of Tilley’s was how long it took for our meals to arrive. Grrr…
Aside from that, it was a really great weekend catching up with a couple of mates which I really enjoyed. Arriving back tonight I feel totally relaxed (despite the work-related phone calls), and feel I can face the world again. It’s amazing what a weekend away can do.