This was the fourth of fifth (or maybe sixth or seventh) time I’ve been to Cafe Sel et Poivre. On the first occasion, I was taken by Colin for my birthday, tasting snails for the very first time and loving the Braised Beef Cheeks with a Burgundy Sauce. It was so good that I invited Damien to come along to taste snails for the very first time and to savour the Braised Beef Cheeks with a Burgundy Sauce. He also loved them both so much that we returned once or twice more. Suffice it to say, I think I’m an expert on these two meals.
The snails? At Cafe Sel et Poivre, they really lay the garlic on very heavily. In fact, so heavily the snails are barely recognisiable both in terms of texture and taste.
The beef cheeks? Simply divine! Apparently they’re as cheap as chips to buy and they need a much shorter braising time than beef ribs. For my money, they are also far more tender and succulent. At Cafe Sel et Poivre, the beef cheeks are obviously marinated for a LONG time. By the time they arrive on your plate, they are well and truly ready for consumption. The accompanying sauce, a rich, thick, almost sickly sweet sauce, provides a terrific accompaniment. I have no idea what’s in the sauce, though, aside from a good red wine which appears to have been reduced several times.
The most important thing I have learned though is that colder weather is the best time to enjoy the Braised Beef Cheeks with a Burgundy Sauce. On the occasions when I have had the Braised Beef Cheeks with a Burgundy Sauce on a warmer day (for lunch) they were never as good. I’ve also learned that the Burgundy Sauce is best enjoyed with some chips or bread and that a fairly light Pinot Noir is the best wine accompaniment, providing just the right balance to the sweetness of the sauce and the intensity of the marinade.
Since I’m fairly adventurous with food, I’m not sure why these are the only dishes I’ve enjoyed at Cafe Sel et Poivre. Perhaps there’s something about the cafe that invokes a certain conservatism? I mean that in a good way, though. I mean, I always feel really welcomed and comfortable when I go there. The staff are lovely. The furnishings are comfortable. It’s a great spot… and in lots of ways, better value than Marque, which Damo and I visited recently. However, next time, I will try something different. Perhaps the Oxtail Casserole, or the Blue Swimmer Crab Bisque, or the Slow-Roasted Lamb? And I’ll save enough room for the Creme Berlot.
The other day, as I was crossing the Ballina Street Bridge in Lismore, I stopped to take a photograph.
It was late in the afternoon, and there was lots of lovely cloud in the sky reflected in the Wilson’s River below.
“You should take some photographs from the southside”, a bloke crossing the bridge stopped to say to me. “You get to see some great views of the rowing club”, he added.
And so that’s what I did today.
But it wasn’t easy to decide where and how I should take these photographs, as the southside of the river doesn’t have the same level of access as the town side.
Traditionally, the southside has been dominated by the railway lines and factories, and so it’s quite hard to know exactly where the best views would be obtained, or even accessed. Being a little unsure, I headed down Union Street, and turned right into NORCO Lane, where I discovered both the “Men’s Shed” and a demolition company with a sign firmly declaring it private property.
The Men’s Shed at South Lismore on NORCO LaneDemolition company on NORCO Lane
Thanks to Google Maps, I eventually figured the best view could be afforded much further down Union Street, closer to Coleman’s Bridge (known locally as “The Double Bridges”), where you can get much closer to the river itself.
Lismore Rowing Club, as viewed from South Lismore
It was a terrific adventure to embark upon, and it took me to some of the backroads of South Lismore I’ve never previously visited.
While I was in the area, I took a closer look at the old railway bridge that connected North and South Lismore.
This is the old railway bridge connecting North and South Lismore. .
The last time I crossed the bridge was about 10 years ago, and I came close to plummeting into the river below, as much of the timber structure is deteriorating.
It’s nice to see they’ve erected fences to stop idiots such as myself from attempting to cross.
“Well, well, isn’t that a happy face!” began the email from h2, who comments from time to time on this blog.
It was such a lovely surprise to receive the email which alerted me to a video clip on the website of the Swedish newspaper, Expressen with yours truly front and centre. My friend Graeme can also be seen in this image.
My friend Kate is currently curating an exhibition of Australian-Chinese art, Coming Home which opens this weekend in Beijing.
According to the Media Release associated with the exhibition…
The Sydney Olympic Park Authority is proud to present ‘Coming Home’ the largest exhibition of Chinese Australian contemporary art ever to be held in the People’s Republic of China.
Following on from 2008’s successful ‘From Mao to Now’ exhibition, this project is part of a broader program of cultural exchange between host cities of the Olympic Games initiated by Sydney Olympic Park. Managed and curated by Catherine Croll, Coming Home opens at the new Linda Gallery, 798 Beijing from 9-24 May.
Coming Home will feature the work of 35 Chinese Australians
This morning, ABC2 Breakfast featured a video story about the exhibition.
As we have a six-year-old in the house, and as it was Easter Sunday (read easter eggs) no one had much of a chance to sleep in this morning. For a six-year-old, Easter lacks the excitement of Christmas Day, but the idea of an Easter Egg Hunt is still enough to get him up early.
For the rest of us, it’s been a day of doing nothing much at all, though we did watch a couple of movies together, including Bran Nue Dae which emerged as a family favourite. Although I’ve been “wanting” to see it for quite some time I never have gotten around to it, mostly due to the limited cinema release, and because I never hire videos anymore. My sister does, and she hired it a few months ago and loved it so much she thought it would be great family viewing. And indeed it was. A great story with a sense of humour, wonderful music, and very well-told.
The other movie a few of us watched today was a replay of “Paper Giants” which I wrote about last week.
And all by myself, I watched “The Emigrants” the classic 1970s Swedish drama which screened this afternoon on the commercial television station, GEM. “Wow”, I thought to myself when I saw it in the program guide. Prior to Bjorn and Benny’s composition of the musical, “Kristina fran Duvemala”, I had no idea of the movie, the books, nor of the immigration to the United States of something like 25% of the Swedish population during the nineteenth century.
Scene from classic Swedish film, The Emigrants
As a film, I don’t think it’s dated all that well, unfortunately, as there are moments when the acting is a little wooden. Still, it was an interesting historical document and still quite entertaining to watch. The best-known names in the film included Max Von Sydow and Liv Ullman, but I was also impressed to see the Swedish jazz legend, Monica Zetterlund play the role of Ulrika.
The only disconcerting thing I found in watching the film was that it was dubbed, not subtitled. The dubbing was very good, but it was still recognisable, particularly in one scene where Robert went from his dubbed English into real English (with a strong Swedish accent).
So, as you can see, it’s that kind of Easter Sunday. Chocolates and film.
Meanwhile, we’re having gorgeous weather in Lismore.
I’ve had some amazing experiences with public transport over the last few months. I’ve been to modern cities. I’ve been to old cities. I’ve been to highly developed western economics. I’ve been to emerging former communist states. I’ve been to “super cities” in Asia. And guess what they all had? An integrated, effective public transport system. In most cases, the trains/trams ran regularly up until midnight, and all you had to do was buy a daily, weekly or monthly ticket and everything was covered.
Singapore: An unbelievably good system with regular trains and it’s cheap.
Stockholm Metro at night
Stockholm: For my first few days there I used the Stockholm Card which included free public transport within the greater Stockholm area, covering buses, trains, metro, and even a couple of ferries. After returning from Narvik, I bought a monthly ticket costing 690 Kr, about $120 Australian. I used it every day several times, especially on the metro system, with regular services every couple of minutes right up until about 1 o’clock in the morning. And, significantly, they’ve managed to build a metro system on a geographically large city on many islands…
Tallin: I didn’t use public transport there much because the city was quite small. On the occasions I did catch some buses or trams, I used my Tallin Card without any worry.
Riga: I also didn’t use public transport there much because I mostly stayed in a small area.
Prague Metro
Prague: Unbelievable! I bought a 5 day pass for the entire public transport system which cost about $30. To get to and from where I was staying I had to catch a brief metro trip (services every few minutes), followed by two stops on a tram. I used it all the time and got around the city very easily. Not an ugly advertisement in sight and they had artistic designs throughout. Oh, and they didn’t have ticket barriers per se, which meant the population got on and off trains quickly and without congestion.
Amsterdam: I didn’t use public transport much, because everything was reasonably close by.
Berlin: I caught a couple of trains and a couple of buses. Fantastic.
London: The tube is quite amazing with lots of regular services. A bit overcrowded for my liking. And probably quite expensive. But still, it worked.
Paris Metro
Paris: The metro system is over 100 years old, is cheap (a daily ticket was 5.80 Euros), and easy to get around. Quite spectacular.
Hong Kong: As with Singapore, an unbelievably good system with regular trains and it’s cheap.
Sydney: Tonight it’s going to take me 35 minutes to get to Bondi. I’ll need to walk 10 minutes from my place to the station to catch a train, and then I need to catch a bus and it’s going cost me about $6.00 each way.
Being an ABBA fan for over 50 years, I was slightly apprehensive about seeing the “animated” ABBA Voyage show in London. It’s a strange thing, isn’t it? When you’ve loved a band since childhood, you feel a certain protectiveness over their legacy. Over the decades, I’ve seen so many tribute shows where the emphasis was almost entirely on the “camp” or the “tacky”—sequins and platforms played for a laugh—rather than a genuine, warm celebration of the music I’ve lived my life alongside. I didn’t want this to be another caricature. Still, the curiosity won out, and I booked my ticket.
Even though I’d read glowing reviews and friends had spoken so positively, I still worried it would feel “clunky.” There’s a specific kind of uncanny valley with digital figures, and I was skeptical about the concept of having ABBA appear as their contemporary selves but looking 45 years younger. It felt like a technical mountain to climb—could they really capture the soul of the band, or would they just be expensive puppets?
The process itself is fascinating. To create these “ABBAtars,” the band members—now in their 70s—spent weeks in a studio wearing motion-capture suits, performing the entire set. They didn’t just provide the voices; they provided the movement, the mannerisms, and the essence of who they are now to recreate who they were then. They also recorded contemporary interludes where they spoke about their lives. There was a particularly beautiful anecdote from Frida where she paid tribute to her grandmother who raised her. It grounded the high-tech spectacle in a very human reality, reminding us that while the figures on stage were frozen in time, the people who created them have lived full, complex lives.
The technology involved is a massive step up from the “holograms” we’ve seen in the past. Usually, those effects are hit-or-miss; you often have to be in the exact right spot to get the effect, and if you move an inch to the left, the illusion shatters. But this was different. These figures performed alongside a phenomenal 10-piece live band in a purpose-built theatre that felt alive. The “ABBA-rena” itself is a marvel, wrapped in hidden screens and thousands of lights that appeared from nowhere, blurring the line between the physical stage and the digital world.
As a regular concert-goer with mobility needs, the logistics are often more stressful than the show itself. I’ve learned the hard way that not all venues are created equal. My biggest hurdle is usually the fear of being “trapped” in the middle of a long row with limited legroom and no easy exit. It’s a safety issue as much as a comfort one. After a nasty fall at a Sydney theatre about 18 months ago while trying to navigate a cramped row, I’ve become much more proactive.
I wrote to the London organisers ahead of time, explained my situation as a right-leg amputee, and they were absolutely brilliant. They sorted out fantastic seats in a dedicated section and even provided a complimentary companion seat for a friend to ensure I had support if I needed it. When we arrived, I was relieved to find we were in a raised section just above the dance floor. We had a perfectly level view of the stage with absolutely no one blocking our line of sight. Being in a row with other wheelchair users and people with similar needs meant there was a shared understanding of space and pace, which made the whole evening far more relaxing.
With the logistics sorted and a drink in hand, the lights dimmed.
The show was an absolute masterclass in immersion. The highlights were endless, but a few moments really stood out. They used 3D animation for a couple of songs that felt like stepping inside a dream—Eagle was particularly breathtaking, with the visuals soaring as high as the vocals. I also loved the musical reworkings of the classics. There was a gorgeous piano accordion introduction to Thank You for the Music that felt very “Swedish folk,” and an extended chorus ending for The Winner Takes It All that gave the song an even more epic, emotional weight.
Despite the songs being 50 years old and the band members now being in their late 70s and 80s, the show felt completely contemporary. It didn’t feel like a museum piece; it felt like a living, breathing concert. The integration of the entire space was what really did it for me. In most modern stadium concerts, you end up watching a tiny, distant figure on a massive LED screen, which becomes the sole focus of your night. Here, the “screens” were everywhere and nowhere at once. I found myself looking up, down, left, and right—there was always something to see. Even watching the joy of the crowd on the dance floor below was part of the entertainment.
One of the most striking things was the atmosphere in the room. Interestingly, there wasn’t a single person using a mobile phone to film or take selfies. The ban was strictly enforced by the staff, and honestly, it was refreshing. While the official reason is to “preserve the magic” for future audiences, I suspect there’s a technical reason too—phone cameras would likely struggle to capture the depth and light of the avatars, making them look flat or distorted. By taking the phones away, they forced everyone to actually be there, in the moment, experiencing it with their own eyes rather than through a five-inch screen.
As for the holograms themselves? Within ten minutes, I stopped looking for the “trick.” To my eyes, they seemed entirely real. They had the weight, the light, and the presence of human beings. By the time the show reached its finale, I wasn’t thinking about computer code or motion capture; I was just an ABBA fan again, 50 years later, lost in the music. It was a truly wonderful, soul-stirring experience.